Friday, May 09, 2008

Invitation To Democrats To Prove They Are Not Racist Or Sexist - Vote McCain

As everyone else is either using the race card, or feeling insulted that others are using the race card in the Democrat primaries, there is only one way for Dems to prove they are not racist or sexist - vote for the all-man, red, WHITE, and blue John McCain.

When black Obama supporters are interviewed and asked why they support him, they respond 99% of the time that they will vote for him because he is black.

Similarly, most women deeply desire Hillary because she is a woman.

Break away from those racist and sexist stereotypes, Dems, and prove that you are looking for more than a person who shares your gender identity or race.
OK, Barack is offering something more than his Africanness - he's offering Change.

To prove how fixated Dems are on electing a minority because he is a minority or a woman because she is a woman, notice what a leading black/female Democrat, Tony Morrison , who has played the gender and race card simultaneously many times during her career said about Bill Clinton in 1998:

"Morrison caused a stir when she called Bill Clinton "the first Black
President;" saying "Clinton displays almost every
trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald's-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas." Wikipedia


In 2008 Ms Morrison, after hearing Ol Black Bill making unkind statements about her endorsee, Obama, renigged on her earlier description of Bubba Clinton, and did a fancy two-step denial not unlike the Lone Ranger's Tonto who, while they were being attacked by Indians, shouted, "What do you mean we, white man?"

"People misunderstood that phrase. I was deploring the way in which President Clinton was being treated, vis-à-vis the sex scandal that was surrounding him. I said he was being treated like a black on the street, already guilty, already a perp. I have no idea what his real instincts are, in terms of race." T. Morrison - Wikipedia

Black or white, male or female, just another lame, ambiguous, awkward, and deceptive explanation for the inexplicable.

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Does Hillary Have Religion?

For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.

After months of the repetitious drone on Obama's faith and ministers, why isn't it time that Hillary Clinton's faith be oggled? If Obama has been effected by Rev White and the Africentric gospel, what has motivated Hillary, spiritually?

Obama has confessed that he "prays to Jesus every night," and that he has attended church on many a Sunday morning.

The most I know about Hillary's spiritual life is that she has often addressed black churches from their pulpits proclaiming, "This is the day the lord has made...," (with a phony black-preacher cadence) and, "You know my husband, Bill, is Baptist." Early in the primaries, church congregants raised the roof shouting for Hillary. Hillary has stopped praising the Lord so much in the black churches more recently because, "Obama has that demographic."

So, what drives Saint Hillary? After doing a cursory search on the net, I could not find any church, denomination, minister or even spiritual advisor Hillary may be seeking for advice or at least fellowship. She has admitted to "hearing" from Eleanor Roosevelt, and has been spiritually guided by several New Agers including Jean Houston, founder of Foundation Of Mind Research.

Before checking the Bible to find any of Hillary's heroes, one should first consider the couple of men who convinced Hillary to switch from the old fashioned Methodism of her parents to the mod, liberation theology of the sixities: Saul Alinsky and Martin Luther King. They both drew traditional protestants and catholics into a Marxist sphere of "helping the poor," not through personal charity, but through vast, bloated, ineffective government programs which could more easily confiscate property from the "haves," and reapportion the funding to the "have nots." Obama has similarly benefitted from this rhetoric, which has the unfortunate consequence of fueling class greed and envy - not known as particularly Christian traits.

Bill Clinton employed lib evangelist Tony Campola for spiritual advice while in the White House. Tony Campola has not been known to be a believer in Gospel fundamentals.

I do have this blurb from as late as 2007 in which Hillary does profess to be a Christian: From gatewaypundit.blogspot.com
"Hillary got a "surprise" visit from her Sunday School teacher from the Chicago area while she spoke in Donnellson, Iowa. (Screengrab-AP)
It looks like Hillary's Jesus moment was likely another staged event for the Democratic front runner.
The New York Daily News reported:
"Clinton called on two audience members for questions, including Amy Fellows of Croton, Iowa, who asked, "Are you a Christian?"

"Yes I am," said Hillary.

"OK, that’s really important to me. God be with you," said Fellows.

"And also with you," the senator answered. "I'm often asked what are the biggest influences in my life and what are the important commitments that kind of keep me going — my faith, my family, my friends, my work. I used to get asked fairly often if I was a praying person. I said yes, I was raised going to church, I'm a Methodist," she said to applause. "I'm a very grateful and committed Methodist."

Fellows told our pool reporter (Pat Healy, for the curious) later that she was not a part of the Clinton campaign and that the question was not planted.

"Having a good Christian in the White House is very important to me," she said, adding she was leaning strongly towards Clinton, but didn't know very much about John Edwards or Obama, including their religions or the brouhaha over Obama's faith and Kerrey's comments.

Also among the 200 people at the Donnellson firehouse was Rosalie Bentzinger, who was the director of religious education Hillary's First Methodist Church in Park Ridge, Ill. She gave Hillary a picture of her confirmation class from March 22, 1959."

Hillary may very well be a practicing Methodist which is one of the most liberal mainline denominations out there. I do not suppose a Progressive Methodism would mind being confused with a Marxist. I am also not sure how one could follow Christ and live with Methodist doctrine simultaneously. Here are just two reasons:

The United Methodist Church began in the early 1970s to view abortion as a "choice". The United Methodist position in favor of abortion has been so strong that two of its institutions helped organize and affiliate with the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights. For many years RCAR used office space in the United Methodist Building which is located across the street from the U.S. Supreme Court. In both 1996 and 1997 the United Methodist Church publicly supported President Clinton's veto of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. While the 1996 United Methodist Church's Book of Discipline still maintains a strong pro-abortion position, it now includes wording recognizing the "sanctity of unborn human life." It further states, "We cannot affirm abortion as an acceptable means of birth control and we unconditionally reject it as a means of gender selection."

On Homosexuality And Abortion
" The UMC has lost two and a half million members since 1965, a decline of 24 percent. The denomination, with thirteen seminaries and almost a hundred affiliated theological schools, runs the largest seminary system in America - none of which are devoted to traditionalist Wesleyan doctrine. A school which teaches Wesleyan doctrine to the exclusion of other ideologies would not be accredited by the University Senate, whose guidelines state: "The United Methodist Church is theologically diverse; there is an expectation that UMC seminarians will be exposed to a variety of theological positions current within Methodism."

"Similar to other mainline denominations, the UMC is divided over the issue of homosexual affirmation. At the national level, however, the issue has essentially been decided. Essentially all church agencies and seminaries openly support "gay" rights. The Director of Recruitment at the denomination's flagship UM seminary - Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington - is a leader in the UM homosexual inclusion movement."

Note: President G W Bush has admitted to being a Methodist, but he has far more times professed a faith in God and the delivering power of Jesus Christ. I have not heard such specifics from Hillary. Does she think it will hurt her union voters? Offend Catholics?

Hard to tell with Hillary because she could have been an improv actor. She has the extraordinary ability to spout off anything that may gain popular support at any given time without thinking of the consequences. A queen of ad libbers. Very contrary to what the Bible says about being "slow to speak."

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Texas Children's Services Nets Huge Haul of Children From Quasi Mormon Compound


Yes, polygamy is illegal,as is pedophilia, and old men marrying too-young girls in Eldorado, Texas.

But, how did one anonymous voice message from one girl at the Yearning For Zion Ranch instigate Texas Child Protective Services to confiscate 400 children without an investigation?

Irony of ironies - A child protective services official, Marleigh Meisner who is overseeing the kidnappings, was also involved in the disastrous rush to judgment at David Koresh's Waco compound in 1993. "In my opinion, this is the largest endeavor we've ever been involved in the state of Texas," said Children's Protective Services spokesman Marleigh Meisner. Meisner was also involved in the 1993 siege of the David Koresh’s Branch Davidian compound located in Waco.

Could not the protective services people have done any sort of investigation before taking the Amish-like children and women from the Temple?

That's why we call them Socialist Services in Ohio. They are all too anxious to take children from parents who may be good and simultaneously leave children in homes with crack whore moms, or worse.

A couple of years ago we suffered the sensational tragedy of the Kenmore Six. A lesbian couple kept several of their children, born during their hetero years, starving in the home attic. The kids broke through a window and were discovered out in the cold streets of Akron Ohio salvaging for food and barely clothed.

Childrens Services had heard of abuse of the children from their fathers, who were not permitted to regularly visit the kids. The local magistrate even threatened the kids' fathers with jail if they would not stop complaining about the abuse inflicted by the lesbian "parents."

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

HillBama Will Be Good For Lawyers, Bad Judges

One of the many things not discussed during the Presidential campaigning is the potential for the legal system to become much more profitable for slip and fall lawyers  as well as become even more ecncrusted with bad lib judges.

 

Lawyers have special interests (your money) and mostly favor democrat candidates who cannot say no to attorneys or yes to tort reform. Yet, democrat voters consistently vote for lawyers and judges who eventually bury them with legal fees or so easily decide against them in domestic relations cases. This paradox can be seen in Hillary-lovin', very unionized Ohio where a well known auto union representative is forever complaining about how the lib female judges, female prosecutors, female children's services caseworkers, and female child support agents are forever mistreating his union clients - usually male democrat voters who are all too excited to vote for Hillary Clinton. Barack as former president of the Harvard Law Review would be no better.

 

What sort of judges would HillBama appoint? My guess is that they would be like two of  the following "Men In Black" who have rabid political agendas meant only to destroy everything we know as holy.

 

This past month,  the good Presbyterian Judge Walter Croskey - appointed by a Republican California governor, no less - decided that he would please the educrats and teacher's unions by demanding that parents of home-schooled children be 'more qualified.'

"Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children," wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court. "Parents who fail to [comply with school enrollment laws] may be subject to a criminal complaint against them, found guilty of an infraction, and subject to imposition of fines or an order to complete a parent education and counseling program."

 

Another lawless judge, Mark Wolf of Massachusetts and appointed by Ronald Reagan, who despite his many successes had trouble choosing some Constitutional judges (S.C. Justices O'Connor and Kennedy), has demanded that Christian schools teach the gay agenda in order to be well rounded. Judge Wolf "ordered the "gay" agenda be taught to Christians who attend a public school in Massachusetts, finding that they need the teachings to be "engaged and productive citizens."  WorldNetDaily.

 

If Republicans can choose bad eggs like these, what in God's name will Democrats appoint? Bill Clinton appointed over 300 federal judges, and the disastrous effect of those appointments  will be experienced for many years to come.

 

Bill Clinton Left A Few Stinkers - Over 370 Fed Judges

 

That aroma wafting across the United States that could make one very ill if inhaled is not some imaginary pollution invented by the EPA or lib college professors, it is the smell of bad law made by Clinton appointed judges. The idea of 'One Man, One Vote' has been replaced by 'One Judge, One Million Votes' as federal judges continue to strip the power of referendum voters away from the common folk. Recently, the Nebraska federal judge Joseph Battalion who has just negated the wishes of 70 per cent of that state's voters desire for a marriage protection act was, of course, appointed by Clinton.


Starting at the top, Judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg, former ACLU activist and Steven Breyer, both appointed by Clinton have been outspoken in favor of sodomy and "the consideration of Foreign Law when deciding American court cases." These are only two of the hundreds of judges stinkin' up the place had not Bill Clinton become president . President Bush, thankfully, has not appointed another David Souter-like chameleon who resembled a Constitution lover before he was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Bush Sr, but as soon as he hit Washington he became infected, and the terrible lib odour, which D.C. is famous for, invaded his soul.


Bad decision after bad decision has followed those judges who Bill Clinton whisked by the Senate and into the Federal Courthouses. And, Republicans in Congress were very much asleep at the wheel. Anything that may have redemptive qualities such as prayer in school or display of the Ten Commandments has been hunted down by the Clinton's Klan of odious judges.


Clinton judges have become infamous for ignoring the Constitution and have been guilty of making -instead of interpreting - bad laws from little to big. For instance, several years ago (1997),we had a huge problem with an enlarged deer population in Ohio which was destroying entire species of plants, causing millions of dollars of damage to cars, killing motorists in the accidents, and otherwise starving legions of deer to death. The National Park system was denied the right to thin the herd because of one Clinton Judge, Paul Friedman, who was urged by a California environmental group to stop the deer hunt. The problem has continued almost unabated until this very day and hundreds of deer carcasses are now rotting in this Cuyahoga Valley National Park south of Cleveland.


It will take many years and many fights with Democrats to undo the damage Clinton's lib judges have been, and are, producing.


Clinton judges have routinely forced the misinterpretation of the 'separation of church' and state laws by entertaining the elimination of any sort of religious expression (not establishment) such as the display of Christmas decorations, display of the Ten Commandments, the oration of the Pledge Of Allegiance in schools, and the In God We Trust inscribed on their New God - Mammon.


Clinton judges have deformed the Virginia Military Institute's all -male admission policy. I am very much for women joining the military, but this should not interfere with the discipline and cohesiveness of a group in a wartime situation. Women and men can be very distracting to one another in tight quarters.


Clinton judges have denied parents the right to know about their daughter's pregnancy, allowing her to be taken across state borders to have their baby killed.


Clinton judges, famous for their regard for lawlessness, are itching to give illegal aliens ( may I emphasize here that they are ILLEGAL) full rights and costly state benefits to people who are here ILLEGALLY. If the courts care not about the citizenry obeying the laws of the land, why should we pay taxes? Why obey any laws when the courts have such a shallow disregard for law?


Clinton appointed over 373 judges and they are leaving a wake of stink as they blaze through with their New Constitution that is more resembling the Communist Manifesto day by day. President Reagan and other more Constitution-honoring presidents have unknowingly nominated some duds, but who would know that the D.C. Beltway would seduce the so-called moderate judges to become such enemies of the people? One Man Equals One Vote. One Judge Equals One Million Votes.



Quoting from Phyllis Schlafly at http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2002/oct02/psroct02.shtml
"All" legislative powers are vested in the Congress, according to the U.S. Constitution. That means no legislative power is granted to the courts. Yet, over the past 50 years, judges have become increasingly activist, writing their own ideas and attitudes into the law.


Some of our most far-reaching social, economic and political decisions have been made by judges rather than by our elected representatives. These include decisions about criminal procedures, prayer and the Ten Commandments in public schools, internal security, pornography, forced busing, racial preferences and quotas, term limits, abortion, and election procedures.


The federal courts have invented new "rights" such as the right to abortion and welfare payments. The federal courts have arbitrarily overturned the votes of the people in California, Colorado, Arizona and Washington State who had the old-fashioned belief that they could exercise self-government. The federal courts have set themselves up as a super-legislature and grabbed authority to micromanage schools, prisons, hiring standards, and legislative reapportionment
.


There is not enough space to list all of the Bad Laws promulgated by Clinton's Bad Judges. Who but a Clinton judge could be confused enough to overturn the ban on partial birth abortion, and still call it gruesome? U.S. District Judge Richard Casey did in 2004, believing that the Supreme Court had been right for deciding that the procedure "that allows the fetus to be partially removed from the womb, whereafter the skull is punctured or crushed" is constitutional. Isn't it fascinating, though, that the excessive affirmative action legislation and civil rights rulings from the courts have come full circle and are now haunting the Democrat presidential contenders, Hillary and Obama? Seems like there is more racism and sexism in the Democrat party than the KKK could even wish for. 

Friday, March 07, 2008

Ann Coulter, No Longer Cute



Dead flies cause the ointment of the apothecary to send forth a stinking savour: [so doth] a little folly him that is in reputation for wisdom [and] honour.

She was our Maureen Dowd - intellectual, snippy, comedic, a babe. But like Maureen Dowd something happened, like fame and familiarity, which may have pushed her toward irrationality.
Molly Ivins and Hillary Clinton had great respect for their conservative fathers, but somewhere along the line they developed a desire to upset everything that was called holy about traditional America , the America their fathers knew. David Brock loved decent America at one time, but his sexual peccadillo got the best of him. Arianna Huffington must have honored her husband - until she turned him gay.

Have we lost Ann Coulter former(?) friend of Bill Maher? I have to admit that I never got her "F" joke about John Edwards. More than one liberal blogger has called Ann Coulter, "The best thing for the Dems." I will defend Ann on her statement about how evangelicals see Jews (as will as Gentiles). "Christians just want to see them perfected," meaning, of course, that most Christians would like to see members of other faiths believe in Christ. That is appropriate if a Christian believes the New Testament.

I know we are not to pay attention to Ann dating liberal Democrats like Andrew Stein, former president of New York City council, Bob Guccione Jr of Hustler magazine fame, or Democrat country-singer Rob Ryan - if all that is true. She may be like what Rush Limbaugh may be, an above-the-belt conservative, but she has also defended Christianity and the Bible. I am really trying to give our national treasure talking heads the benefit of the doubt here. Rush has admitted that in some ways the liberal women whom he dates are less competitive than the conservatives. Wait to you marry one, Rush. The Carville and Matalin combination has deemed them both ineffective as conservative or liberal models.
But all that is the least of the confusion.

By endorsing Hillary Clinton, is Ann resorting to a Sheryl Crow type attempt of humor where Crow demanded that everyone use only "one square of toilet tissue," but latter told us all that it was just a joke? Does Ann have a strategy to hate Mccain and then love Mccain (when compared to Hillbama) as Rush has employed?

Ann has boiled down to a one issue lady - immigration. Hate Mccain because he may be weak on illegal immigration. Weaker than Hillbama? I think not. Ann, who evidently believes only in her own personal repentance for past sins, will not give Mccain the benefit of the doubt on his future plans not to overtax the American people, rich or poor.

As for the war on terror, Ann is sure Hillary would be better at responding to terrorism, because "Hillary said so," in a recent presidential debate.

As for all of Hillary's other promises, Ann does not seem to bothered. Like Hillary wanting to take big oil company profits. BTW Exxon Mobil paid over 30 billion dollars in taxes last year, but that is not enough for Hillary. Hillary blames the Republican governor of Florida for taking the votes away from Florida Democratic primary voters, when, actually, it was the Democratic National Committee that made the decision. There is not room enough in this blog to cite all of the lies, distortions, confusion, contradictions, illegalities, and unethical behaviors, that Evita, as Bob Brinker calls her, which have originated from the Clinton camp. And, Democrats eat up every outrageous promise of Hillary and Obama feed them. Universal health care, free college, baby bonuses, taking over evil corporations, higher taxes, daycare for babies at two months of age, more affirmative action for minorities and women. And, if you think Mccain is worthless on illegal immigration, Ann, what do you think Hillary will do for her vast majority of Hispanic constituents.

Not cute anymore, Ann. If this is just a one big too-clever-over-your-head-joke, I'm not getting it. Maureen Dowd has gone down this road, and look what happened to her. She won a Pulitzer, but lost her soul.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Faxes To Mayors And Colleges Who Would Deny The Military The Ability To Train And Recruit In Their Cities/Colleges

I will be sending the following fax to Colleges, and Mayors such as Toledo Mayor Carty Finkbeiner who unapologetically denied the U.S. Marines to train in his city because they "may scare the residents."

Enough of these losers who not only are praying that the United States does not prevail during the time of WAR, but they also would deny the military to train and recruit in their cities!

<

Monday, February 04, 2008

Oh Lord, Let It Not Be John McCain - A NonRinos's Prayer

Yet, if he is the Repub's candidate, please, give me the strength to vote for him.

Yes, Senator McCain is better than Hillary and Obama, but has our country slidden so far left that we can do no better than this Bob Dole redux?

The NY Times loves him. Arnold loves him. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe love him. Talk about bad company. The past performance of John McCain as war hero does not indicate his future success as President of the United States.

Unfortunately, as a former Catholic and long time Bapticostal, I was mostly taught that Mormonism was a "cult." This undoubtedly hurt Mitt right out of the chute. The more, however, I delve into the doctrinal intricacies of some non-Mormon denominations, they could also be accused of doing some really weird things which I will not go into now. Would Romney bring these cultic(?) practices into the White House? Would hidden holy underwear be a great bother to his performance? Bill Clinton brought in a whole lot more in the form of his bacchanalian rituals which provoked incoming President Bush to fumigate and replace carpeting. Its fair to assume, though, that Clinton was a Bino - Baptist in Name Only. Could Romney, as has been taught by my fellow fundamentalists, really be Satan's representative? I think not, and the more I compare Romney with the Episcopalian turned Baptist (he has not been fully immersed, yet, which is obviously very important to Baptists) McCain, old Mitt is looking much better.

As of now, on the eve of Super Tuesday, I am in Mitt's corner, and not because of the shrill, super conservatives who have been boring me to death on talk radio with the McCain badgering.

Scariest of all - McCain has pledged to "reach across the aisle" to Democrats. What, the Dems can never reach across to Republicans? John McCain has too many negatives on immigration, taxation, freedom of speech retarded by McCain-Feingold, objections to oil drilling in Alaska, hoodwinked by the global warming scare tactic people, treating terrorists like "average American Joes" in Gitmo and elsewhere, allowing Dems to deter judicial nominees, and Clintonesque temper tantrums.

Despite his foibles, I generally have liked John McCain for his heroism and so-so conservative voting record. [I would take anyone over Hillary and Obama at this point]

Let this cup of John McCain for president pass, oh Lord. Amen.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Barack Vs. Hillary: Battle Of The Affirmative Action Candidates

A False Balance Is An Abomination To The Lord

No other Presidential election in U.S. history has presented us with two primary contenders who have been promoted throughout their lives with the full force and credit of the United States government and the myriad of affirmative action and civil rights laws that have pervaded this country since the 1960's.

I was raised a liberal Catholic and was taught to respect all races, and my father, especially, would give us the belt if we exhibited any sort of racism or disrespect to immigrants. I can clearly remember when I was five years old shouting from a house porch, "Look at that chocolate milkman," referring to a neighborhood black man. I got the belt and a stern warning that I never forgot. I loved soul music and had many black friends in high school and the Marine Corps. I was with "the movement," which rallied for minority rights. In the Marine Corps, I believed as the drill instructor taught us at Parris Island, that All Marines Are Green i.e.. Marine Corps green. I worked with the Civil Rights Commission to oust a prejudiced employment agency - that I worked for - because it did not act fairly toward black applicants. I still am an active supporter and admirer of many black candidates and intellectuals including Alan Keyes, Ken Blackwell, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Jesse Lee Peterson and others. I empathized with the blacks who were hosed down, threatened by dogs, denied integrated schooling, and marched with Martin Luther King.

The above scenario was all before Affirmative Action, or AA, and Civil Rights became a multi-billion dollar business which has unfairly denied or hindered many qualified people of all races and genders the ability to work in government and government related jobs, study in universities, as well as be employed at politically correct places of employment, such as the media, liberal churches, Hollywood, newspapers, et al. There is no level or branch of government which does not promote unequal diversity at the expense of taxpayers and efficiency. The same goes for quasi government private companies and any entity - including universities - which have contracted, associations with the government. In many cities where crime has risen, for instance, the police department may be hampered by Affirmative Action not for being undermanned, but just overwomanned as demanded by Civil Rights and EEOC laws. I am not prejudiced. I am postjudiced. I have seen it all.

The United States government, primarily with the help of LBJ , has promoted inequality in the name of equality by boosting unqualified individuals simply because of their race and gender, and even religion as we can now see how Islamo-Americans are allowed to recite their prayers and ceremonies in public schools, demand foot washing facilities in city fire department stations, and are routinely protected from bad publicity in the liberal press - and protected from being labeled terrorists. AA Civil Rights liberals have been stumping for illegal immigrants demanding that they be given so many educational, voting, driving, medical and welfare benefits - even as they are not citizens! Affirmative Action laws and phony civil rights claims is the honey in the Democrat party that attracts everyone who does not appreciate historic American culture. I do not say there has been no need for Civil Rights, per se. There has been no need for Jesse Jackson's and Al Sharpton's brand of PC civil rights overkill.

For years, special points and preferences have been given to women and blacks for just being that - female and African American. It is not hard to venture to say that young American girls have been given increased opportunities to enter college, as the majority of grants and loans are now given to women so that they may study to enter, usually, some bloated social service agency or public school teaching position. In addition, they have been given the 'privilege' of bearing babies out of wedlock and then provided government care because of Affirmative Action which, of course, has promoted women to the point where they are treated better in divorce and custody cases - so that they may be restored rights which were taken away by male chauvinist pigs who hobbled them (LBJ's wording) throughout American history. The same applies to racial minorities. Affirmative Action, has rescued women from their barefoot and pregnant role of being mere chattel, and encouraged them to breakaway from marriage, hate bearing children, and compete with men in every way imaginable. As I now hear of the female Marine Lance Corporal who has been supposedly raped, killed and burned, while pregnant, I have to ask why has Feminism forced the military to admit so many women into a domain that has been world historically occupied by men for the sole reason of being more effective in war? A very high percentage of military women, either on deployment, or on stateside duty are getting pregnant unintentionally, thus straining morale and costing the military many extra millions of dollars to either be supported or replaced in the ranks. I am, however, thankful for all active duty personnel now serving in Iraq, but I hope, after this war, the military returns to sounder policy which does not encourage so much fraterization between sexes.Thank you, Patsy Schroeder and other feminazis who opened the door for the modern woman's destruction.

Know of a Civil Service job where unqualified men or women have been given special preferences because their ability to be competitive has been "hobbled by white men?" Democrat voters in New Hampshire were beside themselves in trying to decide how to appear less racist or gender biased when confronted with the option of voting for either Hillary or Obama.

Dumb white people shrink at the thought of being thought of as racist and so do not question the AA and Civil Rights psychobabble which predominates over American culture. If this social engineering does not defeat the economic, social and political efficacy of the U.S. in the world, as a competitor, nothing else will. Our country is dimishing as the birth rated diminshes. There could have been many grandchildren born as natural U.S. citizens by now if abortion had not been so well promoted by the Feminazis as fueled by Affirmative Action and Civil Rights policies. Two generations of hopelessly dependent welfare recipients and minorities in general believe that "the man" owes him whatever the man owns.This attitude has led to crimes committed by urbanites who are hopeless - according to what they have been taught in church and in the hood - since the man "has hobbled" him ever since slavery has ended. There is no thankfulness; thank the social engineering of the Democrats. The soft bigotry committed by white liberals and the black elite must end. They will not, however, even allow an impoverished black child to enroll in a non public school which is much safer and better disciplined.

Had it not been for AA, Hillary Clinton's Wellesly College would have not become the man-hating university it has. Without Hillary there would have not been such a rabid ACLU which Hillary rallied with at Yale to "protect" the rights of the murderous Black Panthers in the 1960's. I do pray that Evita Clinton's reign - launched and sustained by marriage to a MAN named Bill - will end this year. She was a nice Goldwater Republican until her liberal Methodist church decided to side with the North Vietnamese Communists. Her infamous man-hating private college and former seminary, Wellesly, taught her that the world belonged to women. Hillary learned at the poison Ivy League college Yale that Communism and Feminism was a nice mix. Hillary's Marxist instructors inspired her to later work for the ACLU and an overt communist law firm in California. It was all downhill from there. Womananity, as Al Bundy would say, was Progressing nicely and the Progressive movement was getting aid and comfort from the Fed government's Civil Rights Commission and other Affirmative Action programs such as Title IX programs that are expensive and unnecessary. Hillary has promoted children's rights so much that kids can now feel free in reporting their parents to Big Brother, and Hillary's gang has made child care available to unwed mothers' babies starting as low as two months of age. Girls under 12 may be given birth control pills via their public school - dominated by big lib female teachers and administrators. The libs also "liberated" people from sexual prudence as Bill Clinton, aging hippy, can testify.

Hillary Clinton's assertive, obstinate behavior has taught women everywhere (well, maybe just aging Democrat women) that they can also enjoy marriage and children without a husband in the house. She has persuaded so many women and men that all a child needs is a Collective, err I mean a Village, to raise a child. She has taught the formerly fairer sex that "Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better," as Annie Oakley sang. She has instructed Dead White Males and traditional Americans that they have been replaced by pantsuited single women who do not mind killing babies via abortion so that their careers not be hindered, or hobbled.

Similarly, Barack Obomba has exploded on the scene like out of a Fairy Tale (excuse me, Al Sharpton) which could only be told out of the Affirmative Action playbook.Yes, Barak is a very likable guy - at least, much more than Hillary - and, I can see and sympathize with the hardship that he has experienced. A man does not choose his parents, but Barak could have spoken and legislated more promoting such family values like "to death do us part," in marriage, and the harm which promiscuous sexual relationships can do to unwanted offspring, like himself. Barack was born to a mother, God rest her soul, who was too anxious to get married to a foreign grad student who left her and Barack when he was a mere two years of age. I would call that a bad start in life, although very typical for many abbreviated families in America today. Barack, after being passed around like a bag of Cheetos overseas, was sent back to Hawaii to live with his white grandparents so that he might live in a better environment and become enrolled in a very good school.

In Barack's book Dreams Of My Father, he attempts to imagine his father's dreams, although he only saw his father once, at the age of ten. Since the dad left little Obama at the age of two, I would not count that as a formal, conscious meeting. Unfortunately, neither Barack, nor the press mentions the nurturing, sacrifice and care which was provided to him by his modest and white maternal grandparents, the Dunhams. For eight years Barack lived in a Hawaiian two bedroom apartment with his salesman grandpa and grandma. He was sent to a "very good" school - today's tuition is $15,000 - where there was a lot of ethnic diversity. His white grandparents were not wealthy by any means, but they did provide him a comfortable living and possibly unknowingly supplied him with enough moolah to buy the drugs which "helped him push things out of his mind." Little mention or thanks is offered to these loving grandparents because it does not suit the street creds necessary to be a really diverse, politically correct Democrat politician.

I understand that Barack was a good basketball player but that he would pop off frequently to superiors. He was finding his identity as an Angry Black Man. After Occidental College, Columbia (did someone say "Marxist Brainwashing?"), and Harvard where Barack became president of The Harvard Law Review he learned every Marxist trick in the book, and I do believe he did better than "D student John Kerry" at Yale. However, it seems that the more radical a student becomes, the better they are graded at Yale and Harvard. Looking at some of the more recent college departments, graduates and policies of these and other Poison Ivy League schools could make one retch.

Barack's problem has been, since he was about ten years old, that he is too "ethnically active" for his own race, yet has consciously voided his own Caucasionness. This has been confirmed by Barack himself. Barak seems to have had a grudge against his mother for taking up with his African father for the wrong reasons.She may have married his dad for his blackness, and not his intellectuality. His mother often quipped how "Harry Bellafonte was the most handsome man in the world." This bothered Barack. I must say, that Barack may have resolved the issues, but they must have been deeply ingrained for much of his life. Barack has written that after a black panhandler harassed his grandmother at a bus stop in Hawaii, he was mad at his grandma for not wanting to take the bus again. Obama admired Malcolm X and somewhat less, the communist sympathizing Martin Luther King. (Martin started out well, but sold out to left and their demand for a loss in Vietnam). Obama's now infamous Trinity United Church Of Christ In Chicago is a self proclaimed "Black Pride" church which teaches the Black Value System. Not the Christ Value System. Obama's tenure in the Illinois and United States Senate has not been much of a challenge as all his constituents and promoters have been like-minded. And by like-minded, I mean racially centric minded. I can see nothing in his history which distinquished him as being a messianic uniter of the races, but quite the opposite. I know he will fool the easily foolable Dems, but just how many is the question. I still like him more than Hillary.

Barack has ridden the civil rights train for so long, can he possibly see that his personal mission to establish affirmative action in the streets of Chicago, and in the halls of Columbia and Harvard, and in the legislative corridors of Illinois and the United States Senate may have caused a personal mental distortion and bias against non-blacks who can never do enough to satisfy the always-offended African Americans? Is there not a touch of bigotry in Barack's soul which began so many years ago because of an inconvenient marriage?There may not be, but Barack's own history, especially as a politico, has shown that he is a product of Civil Rights overkill and the bias, bigotry and prejudice which has accompanied the Progressive Movement and Affirmative Action for the last fory years.
[For a good overview of Obama's Identity Crisis see http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_03_12/feature.html by Steve Sailer in The American Conservative.]

Sunday, January 06, 2008

Why Obstetrician-Gynecologist Ron Paul Should Not Be President Of The United States

I know many Paul Bearers, and they are Christian - as most everyone, except Democrats, are now confessing to be. To say they are overly enamored with Ron Paul is an understatement as they think he is just an apocalypse shy of being the Second Coming. Ron Paul is the only "Constitutional" candidate, they claim, and he wants to High Tail It out of Iraq, eliminate the IRS, withdraw from the world, and kill welfare payments including Social Security and Medicaid. Who could ask for anything more?

Ron Paul does have more reasonable ideas such as "really doing something" about the Mexican border and illegal aliens, the NAFTA Highway, abortion, and other points I cannot think of right now. However, his lack of military and geopolitical depth as well as his "no-tax" plans have attracted such peaceniks as Potheads For Paul, Strippers For Paul, the Google people, Johnny Rotten, and other constituents not traditionally known for having a Christian ethic. Why does Mr. Paul attract stripping, pot-smoking folks who might enjoy the Sex Pistols music - as well as church hymns?

Mr. Paul does have that pariah messianic presence which Ross Perot exuded - before his crackpottedness surfaced even as he took 20% of Republican votes away from the general election, thus allowing Bill Clinton to be ushered into the Oral Office for just enough time to subvert all that was called holy in America.

Ron Paul's trouble with the military probably stems from his professional involvement with women. As a man who has delivered thousands of babies, and participating in the miracle of child birthing, he must be naturally resistant to sending this same infant to battle and possibly death. I mean that as a compliment. I have observed former military doctors, corpsman and medics who have this similar disposition. They are so up close and personal to the ravages of war that they are predisposed to be vigorously opposed to military conflict, no matter how necessary. Incdentally, Ron Paul, for all of his compassion, refused to medically treat patients who were on Medicaid and Medicare. I have seen no conclusive evidence that he would help such people for free so that he would not have to charge "the government dime." Medicaid and Medicare just would not pay him enough.

Ron Pallbearers also tout him as the only candidate that is "Constitutional." Some of their reasoning is sound, but one of Paul's more frequent mistakes is calling the Iraq War invalid because the U.S. did not declare war according to the Constitution which demands that Congress shall declare war. Well, Congress has voted on two resolutions to combat Saddam and eradicate Iraq of most of the extreme terrorists. The Constitution does not declare in what exact format Congress shall declare war, so two resolutions to go to war should be enough to satisfy the Constitution. The U.S. had planned to oust Saddam even during Clinton's reign for many more reasons than just WMD. Pauliacs and Democrats constantly ignore these historical facts. Ron Paul has no problem with leaving Iraq high and dry, as well as so many other struggling and fragile democracies around the world.

Under President Paul, Israel would be more at the mercy of their surrounding Islamic enemies without the assistance of the United States. Ron Paul states that the U.S. is "interfering with Israel's sovereignty" by HELPING her!! So, lets not aid Israel so she can retain her sovereignty and then be quickly driven into the Mediterranean by Islamo Fascists. Mr. Paul must also believe that we interfered with Vietnam's sovereignty by fighting the Communists who now have such oppresive control in Nam. He must also object to the post WW II treaties, such as SEATO, in which the United States and other freedom loving countries decided to protect, as much as possible, far flung countries from Communist takeovers. It worked fairly well in Korea and elsewhere until communism took over the Democrat Party left and its media. Ron Paul does not understand that if the United States does not win friends and influence people with money (as with Arab countries and Israel) and with and occasional rattling of the sword (as in Iran and Korea), there will be less incentive for these countries to heed America's nonimperialistic desires. If you are of the hate-America-first crowd, then nothing the United States does can gain the respect of international countries. In fact foreign countries, such as Venezuela, have developed a hatred with the help of the American media. We are so hated according to Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, CNN, Hollywood, academia, the New York Times and others. No wonder we are despised, as the lib press damns everything President Bush does.

Ron Paul recently questioned the attendants at one of his Meetups and mockingly asked them if anyone really believed in the Domino Theory which was one of the motivations for fighting communists in Vietnam. The answer was "no" despite the fact that Laos and Cambodia were also claimed by fascists after the U.S. left Vietnam hanging in the lurch. Worse of all, the U.S. itself became another Communist domino since the 1970's takeover by the libs who are so much closer to totally communizing the United States during this presidential election of 2008 than ever before.

Some of RP's scarier statements include: "It would only take a few nuclear submarines to protect the U.S." When responding to Huckabee's Christmas commercial which displayed a floating cross, Ron Paul said, "Fascism has often come draped in a cross." [When did that last happen, Ron?] Ron Paul was also asked which Democrat most resembled his own platform [not just the Iraq war issue] "Dennis Kucinich," was his answer. Nothing more can be said about Ron Paul's candidacy. He's outta here.

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Al Gore Forced To Repenteth Of His Beguiling Ways

For the most execrable behavior of bewythching the general public and causing panics and expenses to citizenry, and for making pretense beyond that which Satan the devil could ever conjure, we goode people of this land must cause thee above sons of belial to repenteth of their neer-do-welling through the appropriate punishments affordeth us by Divine direction.

Sir James Hansen of NASA, Madame Heidi Cullen of the Weather Channel and Sir Albert Gore with the accompaniment of their false so-called sciences have been leading the disgusting practice of imagineering apocalyptic consequences, and so profiting thereby, despite the objections of many calmer ladies and gentlemen in the community.

We will give the above laudations for their encouragement to save the ethers (energy), however, they must atone for their overindulgence into the speculations falsely warning of global flooding, the demise of polar bears, the hyper warming of the planet (less than 1 degree in 100 years), the Carbon Credit scam, and other products of their deluding science.


Google
WWW http://joeclarke.net